Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf: add encrypted key api #1606

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2024
Merged

perf: add encrypted key api #1606

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

fit2bot
Copy link
Contributor

@fit2bot fit2bot commented Dec 11, 2024

perf: add encrypted key api

@fit2bot fit2bot requested a review from a team December 11, 2024 03:17
}
}
}

func runTasks(jmsService *service.JMService) {
if config.GetConf().UploadFailedReplay {
go uploadRemainReplay(jmsService)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately, you haven't provided the actual code that needs to be checked for differences, improvements or optimizations. Please share the relevant sections of the code so I can assist with analyzing them.

Here are general guidelines on how one might approach checking code:

  1. Review: Look at the structure and format of your code to ensure it is well-documented, easy for other developers to read.

  2. Analyse:

    • Compare function arguments, parameters, return values, etc.
    • Check if there have been any changes since last analysis.
    • Review if any functions have been moved/renamed/replaced
    • Analyze error handling practices

Optimization Suggestion:
For any potential performance improvement in terms of code clarity, readability, efficiency, etc., please provide some sample context from which this advice could be derived (for example, specific lines needing optimization).

Suggestions for code difference detection:
Consider reviewing the following elements:

  • If there's a change in syntax used (like using new keyword instead of define)

  • Consider comparing function bodies too. For instance, compare if an existing function name has changed while retaining all functionality

In summary, without specifics about what needs verification, it'll be hard to give accurate answers.


type ResultValue struct {
Value string `json:"value"`
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code you provided has been updated to remove the Package and service, which should be removed as these lines are not used anymore.

Here's what's changed:

  1. The function name "GetEncryptedConfigValue" is now correctly written with lower case letters (getEncryptedConfigValue) instead of uppercase ("GET_ENCRYPTEDCONFIGVALUE").

No changes were made to the code structure or logic due to no apparent errors or issues being detected. No further modifications are needed at this point unless more specific issues need addressing.

Therefore, there are no major differences or irregularities in current version of your service code snippet. If there are still minor adjustments that could improve performance or adhere better to best practices, feel free to ask for details on those areas!

func (c *Config) UpdateRedisPassword(val string) {
c.RedisPassword = val
}

func GetConf() Config {
if GlobalConfig == nil {
return getDefaultConfig()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a slight difference between the two versions of the code you provided. The first version contains an empty string literal SecretEncryptKey which could lead to some unexpected behavior if used elsewhere. In this case, it's not specified what it means exactly in the context of config, so I would recommend using a more precise name instead (e.g., SecretEncryptionKey).

Additionally, there was no previous implementation for RedisPassword being set in UpdateRedisPassword function.

This small refinement can help avoid any possible bugs or confusion related to these changes.

@LeeEirc LeeEirc merged commit 0c21bcc into dev Dec 11, 2024
7 checks passed
@LeeEirc LeeEirc deleted the pr@dev@perf_encryted_key branch December 11, 2024 03:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants